Joke?
US has military bases around the globe just like the virulent Ebola. Only reason for war. Still in Japan. Okinawa want the military base gone! Yugoslavia war yielded military base on Kosovo!
West is always up to some or other shenanigans. Just very good at playing Jekyll and Hyde!
Ever heard of the "Stuxnet computer code designed to infect industrial plants created by well-funded hackers." http://www.theguardian.com/education/2010/sep/26/iran-computer-bug-attcks-nuclear-plants
Chickens came home to roost!
At it again! NOTE WHO DID NOT "5 EYES"
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/nov/24/regin-malware-western-surveillance-technology "Regin is the latest malicious software to be uncovered by security researchers, though its purpose is unknown, as are its operators. But experts have told the Guardian it was likely spawned in the labs of a western intelligence agency.
None of the targets of the Regin hackers reside on British soil, nor do any live in the US. Most victims are based in Russia and Saudi Arabia - 28% and 24% respectively.
Ireland had the third highest number of targets - 9% of overall detected infections. The infections lists doesn’t include any “five eyes” countries - Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK and the US."
Cold war never went away! West just took advantage of smoke and mirrors! Came a cropper 2008! Too big too lych the banksters! Fiasco! West is sinking under the too big too fail joke! Still notching up debt into the trillions, yielding zillions for the CEO' ONLY!
Its the west which needs constant war! What does it have to show for the last 24 years??? Endless broken countries!!! Junior partner Britain notched up 72 trillion expenditure on its FAILED wars! Only the useless elite have anything to show for it! Gravy train choo....choo....choo....
Think its an accident, ISIS/ISIL/IS mess? Hardly!!!!
Perfect distraction!
Obviously not aware of Noam Chomsky' work!
It takes two to tango! US very, very good at notching up endless wars. US admin doesn't have to pay. Print money, enrich the fed, leave the trillions to be paid for by sacrificing the future of the non elite!
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info
Number Of Iraqis Slaughtered In US War And Occupation Of Iraq "1,455,590"
Number of U.S. Military Personnel Sacrificed (Officially acknowledged) In U.S. War/Occupation Of Iraq 4,801
Number Of International Occupation Force Troops Slaughtered In Afghanistan : 3,481
Cost of War in Iraq & Afghanistan
$1,583,228,372,341
Cross the elite, of the west,
http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/11/25/trotsky-at-the-imf/What’s so disingenuous about the IMF’s apology, is that the bank knew exactly what the effects of its policy would be, but stuck with its recommendations to reward its constituents. That’s what really happened. The only reason it’s trying to distance itself from those decisions now, is to make the public think it was all just a big mistake.
But it wasn’t a mistake. It was deliberate and here’s the chart that proves it:
http://www.counterpunch.org/wp-content/dropzone/2014/11/uriedems11.jpg
Nothing like the proliferation of nukes, eh? Even 2014, its believed the spirit of the treaty is being broken by US/ UK, and they are upgrading and continuing research, to develop new weapons.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/oct/13/usa.pakistan "In the late 80s, in the course of tracking down smugglers of WMD components, Barlow uncovered reams of material that related to Pakistan. It was known the Islamic Republic had been covertly striving to acquire nuclear weapons since India's explosion of a device in 1974 and the prospect terrified the west - especially given the instability of a nation that had had three military coups in less than 30 years . Straddling deep ethnic, religious and political fault-lines, it was also a country regularly rocked by inter-communal violence. "Pakistan was the kind of place where technology could slip out of control," Barlow says.
He soon discovered, however, that senior officials in government were taking quite the opposite view: they were breaking US and international non-proliferation protocols to shelter Pakistan's ambitions and even sell it banned WMD technology. In the closing years of the cold war, Pakistan was considered to have great strategic importance. It provided Washington with a springboard into neighbouring Afghanistan - a route for passing US weapons and cash to the mujahideen, who were battling to oust the Soviet army that had invaded in 1979. Barlow says, "We had to buddy-up to regimes we didn't see eye-to-eye with, but I could not believe we would actually give Pakistan the bomb.
How could any US administration set such short-term gains against the long-term safety of the world?" Next he discovered that the Pentagon was preparing to sell Pakistan jet fighters that could be used to drop a nuclear bomb."
http://www.infowars.com/who-gave-north-korea-nukes-in-the-first-place/ WHO GAVE NORTH KOREA NUKES IN THE FIRST PLACE?
However, while bellicose threats are being carelessly traded by both sides and eagerly regurgitated by the mainstream media, the question of how exactly North Korea acquired its nuclear capability in the first place has been completely ignored.
Both the Clinton and Bush administrations played a key role in helping the late Kim Jong-Il develop North Korea’s nuclear prowess from the mid 1990′s onwards.
Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld presided over a $200 million dollar contract to deliver equipment and services to build two light water reactor stations in North Korea in January 2000 when he was an executive director of ABB (Asea Brown Boveri). Wolfram Eberhardt, a spokesman for ABB confirmed that Rumsfeld was at nearly all the board meetings during his involvement with the company.
Rumsfeld was merely picking up the baton from the Clinton administration, who in 1994 agreed to replace North Korea’s domestically built nuclear reactors with light water nuclear reactors. Clinton policy wonks claimed that light water reactors couldn’t be used to make bombs. Not so according to Henry Sokolski, head of the Non-proliferation Policy Education Center in Washington, who stated, “LWRs could be used to produce dozens of bombs’ worth of weapons-grade plutonium in both North Korea and Iran. This is true of all LWRs ― a depressing fact U.S. policymakers have managed to block out.”
“These reactors are like all reactors, they have the potential to make weapons. So you might end up supplying the worst nuclear violator with the means to acquire the very weapons we’re trying to prevent it acquiring,” said Sokolski."
Ebola was to be a bio weapon!
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/10/bioweapons-expert-reaffirms-belief-ebola-escaped-biowarfare-lab.html
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/10/obama-calls-pause-offensive-bioweapons-research.htmlhtml
http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/10/10/ebola-the-african-union-and-bioeconomic-warfare/
a "cold" war is up to USA. the "west" played a big hand in Maidan, Ukraine, Kiev, etc. Russia defended people in eastern Unraine from government (Ukrainian) forces killing innocent civilians. Russia never wanted a war, cold, hot, lukewarm or economic. but the growing power of Russia, as it is in Putin's years, is a reason for some (USA?) to wish to put a halt to it. Russia has been developing infrastructure under Putin like never before.
No. The Cold War was over an ideological divide.
Russia and the US are both capitalist.
Likely the next major war between many nations will be Armageddon, but there will be survivors.
No. You should learn about the Non-Proliferation Treaty
He really think, that i advise you.
