Where would you Rather live?
Russia.
China is much more violent. Food, behavior, rules...so on.
But because US has a huge DEBT to China and connection of the nototries products: "Made in China", US doesn't put anything bad about it on the NEWS. US is dead without China.
But I should add that China without US is dead too, since US buys 40% of its products.
Well, China has better weather. And the Chink chicks dig tall white guys. So there's that. But they also have a lot of smog. Like, you need to wear a face mask in all the major cities. And they eat cockroaches, spiders and all that eww stuff. I watched a documentary about it a while ago. It's disgusting. They don't like football, they don't understand dark humour and, worst of all, they speak Chinese. It would take me ages to learn all those ching-chong signs. So Russia.
@Nunchuks
'But because US has a huge DEBT to China and connection of the nototries products: "Made in China", US doesn't put anything bad about it on the NEWS. US is dead without China.'
It will be decades before Chinese corporations even in strategic industries like renewable energy and information technologies beat American companies on their own turf. It might not even happen at all. China is a closed society and so are its corporations. The country lacks the dynamism needed to stimulate new ideas and the collaboration required to monetize them.
China's reliance on the U.S. is real, but takes a somewhat different form than commonly believed. It is true that China exports a great deal to the U.S. In 2008, American demand accounted for 7.4 percent of Chinese GDP.
That number has been falling, however, and will fall again for 2009. In terms of GDP, the PRC has substituted domestic investment for exports since 1998 and more substantially since global demand peaked in 2006.
The fundamental Chinese dependence is on the American-built and American-led international economic system. Because it invests so much, China produces far more than it consumes across a wide range of sectors. It has done so since the Asian financial crisis of 1997.
Without an export outlet, constant oversupply would generate crushing deflation and cripple genuine Chinese growth. Open global trade fomented by the U.S. enables China's investment-led model to work, while serious American protectionism would ultimately make that model unviable.
The same is true in finance. Without the U.S. dollar as the world's reserve currency and the American bond market as safe haven, China's exchange rate and balance of payments regime could not function. The PRC gains considerably from the American consumer, but relies utterly on the American-led system.
On the American side, China is the cheapest supplier of many consumer goods, but other low-cost suppliers--such as Vietnam--could emerge to replace it and would be happy to do so. Without China, consumer prices in the U.S. would be higher, but not much.
The notion that the U.S. needs China to finance its budget deficit is flawed in a number of ways. One is logical: The deficit is much too large, so Chinese financing merely makes it easier for the U.S. to perpetuate bad policy. The other is factual: Chinese bond purchases do not seem to be affecting American interest rates.
This leaves China effectively relying on the U.S. to keep its very development model viable, and the U.S. collaborating with China as a matter of convenience.
I would much rather live in China. Russia is far too depressing and the people are brutish. Plus the food is better in China. They also welcome english speakers.
Russia...........
Russia..
If You Want Very Good Answer Please See :
http://www.wwgtfy.com/?q=Russia+vs+China...
I like Russia...........
china
russia
